Like it happened with the keyers when clean blacks and clean whites were introduced (which are not really better treatments).

What I want to point out is, that it is a unpolite product policy of BM to change tools and to let the old version dissapear while color graders work based on that tools. is a true new developed tool where developers thought about how to face the actual needs in colorgrading.Īnd a tool like 'Technical Grade' is a very good example that an old(?) (log-Tool) can be used to achieve very nice looks with incredible speed. The tools not really! While the new tint/temp sliders will for sure attract new users, it's easy to find out that they are simple the gain ball in the directions of blue/yellow/magenta/green.

So you can first desaturate with video-grade, then tint with Film-Grade, then log-ish grade with curve crade, put a color-mixer into the row and then shift the blues to cyan in just one layer! In Baselight you can change the order of the tools in the cascade for every layer. But due to strict order of the tools in which there are processed, I need more nodes than I would like to have. With Resolve the node-tree is great because I have visible clarity. But you have to work further (with additional tools / nodes) to refine it. One gets quickly an impressing result, yes. In other words I find Resolve is often somehow rough. Both have very nice behavior of the 'plain' Video-Grade tool. This was already there before the full implementation of the Color Management into Baselight. It is the same with Sratch and Lustre.

When Resolve lets you think of keying or Log-grading something (to correct it), you'll get nice results instantly with Baselights Video-Grade (or Film-Grade). My experience with Baselight is you get better results faster.

Color grading davinci resolve italiano